DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ismail Rumadan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-07T07:19:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-07T07:19:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-30 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.klri.re.kr/handle/2017.oak/9799 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The judiciary plays a very important role in encouraging the progress of the ease of doing business in Indonesia because the judiciary is also affected by economic globalization. The Indonesian Supreme Court has issued several policies related to justice reform to provide the best services for justice seekers, especially in the case of a quick, simple, and inexpensive case resolution process to support the ease of doing business. However, the policy has not reached the final stage of enforcement of the decision, especially in civil disputes, related to payment of a sum of money. There is still a legal vacuum to trace the Respon dent’s assets, making it difficult for the Petitioner to obtain his rights after a court ruling ordered payment of a sum of money. Therefore, the Supreme Court needs to strictly regulate the authority and responsibility of tracing the Respondent’s assets to facilitate the enforcement of decision for the fulfillment of the Petition er’s rights. | - |
dc.publisher | 한국법제연구원 | - |
dc.title | Enforcement of Court Decision Regarding Payment of a Sum of Money in Civil Disputes to Support the Ease of Doing Business in Indonesia | - |
dc.citation.date | 2020 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 414 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.publisher | 한국법제연구원 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 389 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Vol. 10 Issue. 2 Page. 389-414, 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.localId | 18051k | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | 원문무료이용 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Enforcement of Court Decision | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Civil Dispute | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Payment of a Sum of Money. | - |
dc.title.partName | Articles | - |
dc.type.local | KLRI Journal of Law and Legislation | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | Ismail Rumadan | - |
dc.description.tableOfContents | Ⅰ. Background Issues Ⅱ. Definition and Scope of the Study Ⅲ. Problems in Enforcing Civil Court Decisions in General A. Enforcement of Decision cannot be realized B.Delegation (Request for Assistance) of Court Decision Enforcement C.Third Party Opposition to execution of objects located outside the jurisdiction of the court D. Execution objects are under the third party’s control E. Two conflicting court decisions F. Objection from the Third Party Ⅳ. Execution of Payment of Amount of Money for the Ease of Doing Business Ⅴ. Execution of Payment of Amount of Money in Other Countries Ⅵ. Improving the Enforcement of Court Decision related to Payment of a Sum of Money Ⅶ. Conclusion | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.