DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Judith Janna Martens | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-07T07:19:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-07T07:19:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-31 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.klri.re.kr/handle/2017.oak/9801 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The relationship between the European Constitutional Courts and the Eu ropean Court of Human Rights in the multilevel system of human rights protec tion has been discussed intensively. In fact, the ECtHR has a strong influence on the German Constitutional Court and vice versa the ECtHR has been strongly paid attention to the German jurisprudence. Gradually, a steady cooperation be tween the courts has been developed. The article will explain how German Basic Rights were redefined by the case law of the ECtHR. The development of the right of privacy and the right of self-determination under Article 8 ECHR and the corresponding general right of personality in German law will illustrate the impact of the ECtHR’s jurisprudence in German law. In this respect, the article will discuss the cases Von Hannover v. Germany in order to show privacy pro tection against the media. Then, the case Koch v. Germany will clarify the scope of self-determination regarding the right to die in dignity. Finally, the article will argue that the ECtHR’s case law and the domestic jurisprudence are interwoven in a complex system of human rights protection and that the cooperation of the courts is substantial for an effective protection system of human rights in Europe. | - |
dc.publisher | 한국법제연구원 | - |
dc.title | German Basic Rights Refined by the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights - The development of Privacy and Self-Determination in German Jurisprudence | - |
dc.citation.date | 2020 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 43 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.publisher | 한국법제연구원 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 7 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Vol. 10 Issue. 1 Page. 7-43, 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.localId | 18053k | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | 원문무료이용 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | ECtHR’s Case Law | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Right to Privacy uder Article 8 ECHR | - |
dc.subject.keyword | German Law | - |
dc.subject.keyword | The General Right of Personality | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Self-determination | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Right to Die in Dignity | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Cooperation of Constitutional Courts | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Margin of Appreciation | - |
dc.title.partName | Articles | - |
dc.type.local | KLRI Journal of Law and Legislation | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | Judith Janna Martens | - |
dc.description.tableOfContents | I. Introduction II. The Multilevel System of Human Rights Protection in Europe III. The scope of Article 8 of the ECHR – Personality Rights and Self Determination IV. German Jurisprudence on Privacy in the Light of the ECtHR’s Rulings A. Privacy Protection in German Law B. Basic Rights in Conflict with Privacy C. Von Hannover v. Germany Cases 1. The Constellation of the Case 2. The ECtHR’s Balancing of Freedom of Press and Privacy 3. The Following Procedure before German Courts D. The ECtHR’s Impact on German Jurisprudence and the Cooperation between the Courts V. German Jurisprudence on Self-Determination in the Light of the ECtHR’s Rulings A. The Right of Self-Determination in German Law B. The ECtHR’s Jurisprudence on Self-Determination and the Right to Die with Dignity 1. The Koch v. Germany case 2. The ECtHR’s Impact on German Jurisprudence C. Recent Developments on Self-Determination in German Law VI. Conclusion | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.